Does the "fairer sex" make for more "fairer politics?"

I've always believed in hiring the best person for the job. I don't care if you're a man, or a woman, black or white, or even pink or green. I just want someone who will go in and do their job properly, fairly and ethically. I want to hire a person who will go the extra step to do their job that much better than the person before them; especially when we're talking about politics. I also believe in equality for everyone. But, I don't believe in putting someone into a position they're not qualified for just to fill a quota. In the essay, "Women in politics," they claim that, "Only three nations come close to boasting gender balance; Rwanda... Sweden... and Findland." It is hard to believe that in this day and age the percentage of women in politics, especially, in some of the most modern countries in the world, is so low. I believe every country in the world would benefit from a balance in their political parties. Everyone will be better represented if there is a more equal balancing and we support both sexes equally. Perhaps there would be less fighting and more negotiating if we had more women in politics. Perhaps the fairer sex would bring a different point of view or see things in a different light than men would. But then again, I don't really care which sex represents me; I just want someone who will do what they promise and take care of their constituents.

Do you think women in power would be more or less likely to go to war than men?